Critical financial applications still rely on manual identity execution

When an application cannot follow your standard identity workflow, approved access changes fall back to tickets, local administrators, scripts, or spreadsheets. That adds delay, recurring maintenance, and evidence work to every joiner, mover, leaver, and access review.

Financial Services

See why identity approval is only half the workflow

Watch Donovan Blaylock, Field CISO at Cerby, show how identity decisions can stop before the application changes, and how Cerby closes the execution gap.

What Cerby Does

World Icon
Automate lifecycle execution

Provision, update, disable, and remove accounts in selected payment, treasury, tax, and other critical financial applications.

 

Stopwatch Icon
Strengthen audit readiness

Record the approved action, observed target state, completion, and exception so evidence does not depend on a manual follow-up.

 

Hierarchy Icon
Lower the cost of the long tail

Compare managed automation with tickets, scripts, RPA, iPaaS, and custom connectors across deployment and ongoing maintenance.

Proven outcomes across disconnected applications

Business ROI

280 %

Up to 280% ROI reported by monday.com

 

Operational Savings

3300 +

IT hours reclaimed annually at monday.com

 

Identity Automation

90 %

Of identity workflows automated for hard-to-reach apps at Colgate-Palmolive

Recommended Resources

SOLUTION BRIEF

Identity Security and Compliance for Financial Services


A financial-services view of disconnected application risk, lifecycle automation, access controls, and audit readiness.

BLOG

The hidden cost of manual identity work in financial services


Manual identity execution is the work required after a policy decision is made but before an application account actually changes.

RESEARCH REPORT

The Business Value of Cerby


Customer outcomes across identity automation, IT capacity, access reviews, and application attack-surface reduction.

Benchmark your highest-cost financial identity workflows

Select 10 applications or workflows and compare manual effort, connector maintenance, completion time, evidence work, and three-year operating cost across the current and Cerby paths.